your current location：首页 > news>[Data Organization] The limit of the speed of beekeeping products [FR] Forestry Minecraft Game

[Data Organization] The limit of the speed of beekeeping products [FR] Forestry Minecraft Game

2024-12-09 18:31:29|Myriagame |source：minecraft skins

This tutorial is set by the author to use the CC By-NC-SA protocol.

This tutorial took 5 hours to do a comprehensive comparative test before and after. In fact, I forgot a lot of beekeeping knowledge before doing this test. Later

Welcome to correct the opinions of correcting and putting forward additional testing

MC and module version of this test

mc: 1.12.2

Forge: 14.23.5.2815

The integrated package is GregBlock 2.2.0 (there should be no impact)

Forestry: 5.8.2.387

Binnie's Mods: 2.5.1.188

There is no magic bee in this test!

Review:

Work speed: slower (0.3), slower (0.6), slow speed (0.8), ordinary (1.0), fast (1.2), faster (1.4), fastest (1.7).

The final output rate of production products in the first round (27.5S/550T): production base × working speed × production probability.

Simple beehive beehive box production base 0.25 0.1 1.0 mutation base 0 1.0 1.0 life base 3.0 1.0 1.0 pollination base 3.0 1.0 1.0 gene attenuation 0 1.0 1.0 1.0

The control group of the test group (the attribute is obtained) (if there is no special statement, the bee is used)

Product data defaults:

Let's study the maximum product rate of a single bee first:

Blank control group: In the beehive group, no framework and upgrade component

When a electric stimulator is placed, the electrical stimulator amplify the circuit board, and when the circuit board is filled with diamond electronic tubes:

(Screenshots in the box are tested first before writing this article, the same below)

(Princess bee has been taken out of the confirmation gene, the same below)

After putting more electric stimulators (after the electrical stimulator of the two lines), the result is not changed from the above one.picture)

In order to prove the above conclusion, I tried to raise the gene to the fastest work (only the genes that magic bees had a way to survive), and then the product rate did not change (the test of multiple sets of data was the same):

At this time, the final output rate is 100%.

I put two frameworks on the beehive group when the testing framework impacts the beehive group, and then placed two immersive frameworks. At this time, the final number of products with different output rates is different in the end, which proves that there is no final yield or 100%:

At the same time under the three frameworks, the final output rate under the immersion framework of each frame reaches 100%. At this time, the product:

Then the maximum product rate of a single bee has been studied, then the product rate of the volume of the unit's volume:

The first is an beehive. Don't forget that the production base of the beehive is only 0.1

The control group of the beehive (no framework):

We verify two frameworks:

The group that puts all the chocolate framework for a three -wheeled test (found on the beehive, no matter what framework is added, it cannot reach 100%. In other words, even if the working speed attributes are the same, the final output rate is the same but not 100%.Find a prize problem, so the average value of three times)

(This time the face is too dark)

The average output speed is: 1.667 silk honeycomb (25%basic yield), 0.333 mucus honeycomb (12%yield)

The beehive is full of impregnation framework:

The average output speed is: 11.667 silk skid honeycomb (25%basic yield), 8.333 mucus honeycomb (12%yield)

We can know that the two beehives with frameworks with frameworks. If a single bee is a single bee, the maximum product rate must be the beehive set, but is the unit volume certain?

The answer is also easy to draw: not, with the thermal pipeline, I set up an example of an automated beehive, which contains product collection, frame bee placing devices, and the beehive body is in the volume of 3*3*4. At this timeThe number of beehives is 18, and the devices of items and product collection are placed next door to the 3*3*4 (after all, the beehive group cannot be placed.

(Figure, you can't get up together) (Do you think you are playing with Gray Jian Four Passing furnaces?)

Automation exhibitions are as shown in the figure:

It can be seen that the volume efficiency of the unit is much higher than that the beehive set is theoretically optimized or using the last shadow pipe can be placed in 24 beehives within the volume

But unfortunately, because the framework cannot be automatically put into the beehive, this is not completely automated

Although the calibration framework is only consumed under the destruction of the longest life bee.EssenceEssence

alright

Finally, a simple beehive

Can't be tuned, funnel operations, you can only find a beekeeper to help you watch

Although it is automatically, and the production base of simple beehives is higher, the result is not considerable. The maximum is only about 20%of the beehive.

Summarize:

This test can be seen that if the beehive is stacked, it is really better than the beehive set, and the cost is much cheap, but the beehive group can be completely automatic and no manual supplementary framework is required.

In addition, the beehive group has other functional cubes, such as beehive filters, beehives humidifiers, electric stimuli in other types of electronic tube, etc. This is not available in the beehive.

Secondly, the genes of the bees that are tested are full. However, this is a difficult thing in the first and middle period of beekeeping. This experiment only uses one electrical stimulator or three frameworks to use more electrical stimuli orThe framework can make up for the defects that genes are not completely optimal

at last

Thank you Chuyang Time, I recommend everyone to see his original data summary, and some other posts of mine

Forestry Q & A

Beehive comparison

more news

MORE +