your current location:首页 > news>The director of "Automotor Story" responded to the defendant plagiarism: Disney is discrediting

The director of "Automotor Story" responded to the defendant plagiarism: Disney is discrediting

2025-01-27 11:09:36|Myriagame |source:minecraft skins

Yesterday (June 22), we reported the news that Disney -like sued the domestic animation "Automotive Story" inrting the case in Shanghai.In fact, the producers and directors of the domestic animation "Automotive Story" have not admitted that they are plagiarism. For this reason, Zhuo Jianrong, the director of this game, also played with netizens on the Internet.According to the report of Watching Hollywood, the director came out to issue a statement again, once again said that "Automotive Story" did not copy, and also said that "Disney hired the Internet water forces to discredit my movie, causing the car people's movie box office to lose."

Zhuo Jianrong, the director of "Autobot Mobilization", asked to respond to the defendant's infringement through Sina. The following is his original words:

"Disney, I'm afraid of you. You have a car man, I don't accept it, I hope you don't want to make up my movie ... About the opening of the Shanghai Pudong Court for trial of a carman case: I also want to counter Disney to obstruct justice and stop the carman's release.Ask the Internet Water Army and inducing the media to report unjustly to the autonomy of the auto man, which led to the loss of the box office of the car people. Disney has its main responsibility.

(1) I am still worried, because Disney opened the park in Pudong, Shanghai, will there be a local protection special right?

(2) Disney lawyers are unprofessional. From August last year to today, they opened three courts. The other lawyer did not know what to do in the first two days.

(3) Our movie is independent, and there is no plagiarism at all.As a public field, cars have limited creative space. Each image has our own characteristics. Eyes, mouths, mouths, shapes, and completely different. You can see it compared with the content of the two movies.

Therefore, we have reason to believe that Disney's chaos is used, causing judicial injustice. Several times to the Fujian Film Bureau to prevent the release of auto people, and also called the Xiamen government to investigate the blue flame, which led the Xiamen government to have bias to our company.According to Xiamen's subsidy policy for cartoons, we should be able to get a policy subsidy of 250,000 yuan, but because of Disney and a sentence led by the relevant authorities of Xiamen, the auto person cannot have government subsidies.Therefore, Disney's pressure on the Xiamen Municipal Government caused the Xiamen Municipal Government to treat the blue flame unfairness.I reiterate here that if the auto man gets government subsidies, we will donate all to poor students."" ".

From the above words, we can see Zhuo Jianrong, director of "Automotive Story", is simply not acknowledging the plagiarism of his works. It is also said that netizens found that the movie plagiarism is called Dead Disney to hire an online water army.Such a statement also caused the anger and heated discussion of netizens, and always felt that a new online war was about to begin.