Blizzard said that Afa will challenge "Star 2": Human micro exercises are weak and explosive

2025-01-27 13:40:09|Myriagame |source：minecraft skins

Just on the 27th, Blizzard had clearly stated that "Star 2" would accept AlphaGo's challenge.Compared with the "human -machine Go", which has been rushing before, StarCraft 2 with game attributes will be more likely to resonate and arouse disputes.

If the previous Go is the confrontation between Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi, then Star Two is "Zhuge Liang+Guan Yu vs Sima Yi+Lu Bu".

The comparison is a wisdom and courage.

After all, for RTS e -sports games, there are equally important practical exercises after decision -making.

So the question is, should we discuss the fairness of this PK before discussing human win or A dog win?

How to reserve A dog's tactical choice?

At a strategic perspective, AlphaGo should reserve almost all tactical play and routine.Therefore, the biggest interest of A dog is whether it can be good to fight tactics. If it is successfully deceived by tactics to the professional players who play against them, I believe everyone is happy to see it.

In the same way, how professional players deceive the computer are also expected.The well -known Chinese interstellar F91 also believes that tactics will also be the most worthy of discussion in this competition.

Regarding the tactical game, some people may worry that AI ignores the "War Mist" (full -picture view), but I believe that even if this game has this ability, it will be forcibly cut off.

How to set the practical level of A dog?

The most unspeakable but most controversial is undoubtedly AlphaGo's micro operation (APM).

There is no look at because of well -known AI such as Hummer 2000, which has long shown the micro -exercise that surpassed the century of human beings to the fullest.

For example, this kind of airdrop tank is operated at the same time in the 4th line (about 20 times in one second?).If humans want to implement this micro -exercise, and not to mention whether the game can receive so many instructions at the same time, a set of keyboard mouse is definitely not enough.

Another example is that this puppy's instant scattering when it is in the tank, not only completely inherits the multi -line micro -exercise above, but also has to have an open -minded God predicted to know how to get started.

In summary, whether the dog has such a micro -exercise strength (should not be).But even if you win human beings in this way, there is no point.

Because you can go to this AI self -abuse now, why do you need to work?Because you can go to this AI self -abuse now, why do you need to work?

So the biggest point of dispute is how to set A dog's micro -exercise strength? Is it simulating AI or simulating humans? Should APM have a mean and upper limit, and so on.

I think this is why some players call for it, only the reason for the operation of a robotic arm to "separate" operation can be considered fair.

Which player can be the appointment? Which player can be the appointment?

When Google and Blizzard discuss the specific details of this competition, it is fair enough to be fair. So which players do you think is most suitable for the dog?

At present, the highest voices and publicly stated that the kidney leader Flash, who is not afraid of fighting, is the most likely. After all, the title of the leader is spicy.

Regardless of the final result, even if the game of AlphaGo lost "StarCraft 2", the game is made as a wave of advertisements.I am afraid that from the perspective of the masses, it is no different from RTS and Go. Anyway, I do n’t want to play or want to play anyway.

Can't help but feel bad for me to wait for the interstellar dog ...

• 

  National Service DNF Dark Ni

• 

  The new screenshot of the be

• 

  The 15th anniversary wallpap

• 

  3DM Xuanyuan Sinicization Gr

• 

  French magazine is the first

• 

  The sneak game "Republic" wi